Group Health Cooperative Logo Group Health Center for Health Studies

 skip navigation

site map  search  ghc.org    
         

Explore CHS

 
     Home  
     Research  
     Center Staff  
     Scientific Resources  
     The MacColl Institute  
 
 
  Community Health
and Evaluation
 
 
 
  GH's Dept of 
Preventive Care
 
     CHS Bibliography  
     News Releases  
     Events  
 Research Newsletter
     Career Opportunities  
     About CHS  
     Contact Us  
     Study Participants  
 
 

May 16, 2006

Intimate partner violence found widespread:
It harms women’s health, say Group Health researchers

Seattle—Intimate partner violence (IPV), a.k.a. domestic violence, is common and damages women’s physical and mental health significantly, according to a Group Health study reported in two papers in the June issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

In a random sample of more than 3,400 women members of Group Health Cooperative, nearly half—44 percent—reported having experienced IPV during their adult lifetime.

"This is an epidemic," said Robert S. Thompson, MD, senior investigator, Group Health Center for Health Studies, lead author of one paper. "But it flies under the radar, because of the stigma and shame associated with it—as well as the fear that many health care providers have of opening what some call a ‘Pandora’s Box’ of difficult problems that they are unsure how to address."

This study is the first to find that the more recent a woman’s IPV, and the longer it has gone on, the worse her physical and mental health and social network are likely to be.

"IPV harms women’s physical and mental health even more than do other common conditions, such as back pain and even several forms of cancer," said Amy E. Bonomi, PhD, MPH, senior research associate, Group Health Center for Health Studies, lead author of the other paper. Compared to women with no IPV, women with recent physical IPV were four times as likely to report symptoms of severe depression, nearly three times as likely to report poor or fair health and more than one additional symptom. They also reported lower social functioning by several measures.

Previous estimates ranged from a quarter to a half of women experiencing IPV during their adult lifetimes, depending on how researchers defined IPV and whom they sampled, with young, low-income women reporting more IPV. Interestingly, this study (reporting a prevalence of nearly one half) involves health plan enrollees who tend to be older and have higher incomes and more education than average, making it clear that IPV is an equal-opportunity problem.

Bonomi and Thompson found the effects of physical abuse (slapping, hitting, kicking, or forced sex) to be stronger than those of nonphysical abuse (threats, chronic disparaging remarks, or controlling behavior) alone. But they also found that both physical and nonphysical IPV significantly damage women’s health, and that physical abuse often accompanies nonphysical abuse.

IPV persisted for more than 20 years in 5 percent to 13 percent of the women, with more than one partner perpetrating IPV on 11 percent to 21 percent of them, with these ranges depending on the type of abuse. Prevalence was 15 percent in the last five years, and 8 percent in the last year, for any IPV.

"We are at a point with IPV that seems similar to where we were with cigarette smoking and alcoholism 20 years ago," said Bonomi. "To prevent IPV from starting and continuing, we need interventions that span individual, community, and social levels." She and Thompson suggest that these interventions should include inquiring routinely about IPV and linking those with positive responses to appropriate services.

The Agency for Health Research and Quality funded the study. The other authors of the papers about the study are Group Health Center for Health Studies affiliate scientific investigator Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH, of Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center and the University of Washington; and Melissa Anderson, MS; Robert J. Reid, MD, PhD; Jane A. Dimer, MD; David Carrell, PhD, of Group Health—all in Seattle.

Two commentaries accompany the papers about the study: one by James S. Marks, MD, MPH, and Elaine F. Cassidy, PhD, of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, in Princeton, NJ; and the other by Ann L. Coker, PhD, of the University of Texas Health Science Center, in Houston.

 

About Group Health Center for Health Studies

Founded in 1947, Group Health is a consumer-governed, nonprofit health care system that coordinates care and coverage. Based in Seattle, Group Health and its subsidiary health carriers, Group Health Options, Inc. and KPS Health Plans, serve more than 568,000 members in Washington and Idaho. Group Health Center for Health Studies conducts research related to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of major health problems. It is funded primarily through government and private research grants.

Top

 
News Release Contacts
  • Center for Health Studies
    Joan DeClaire
    206-287-2653
  • Group Health Cooperative
    Katie McCarthy
    206-448-2149

 

More News Releases
           
 
site map  search  ghc.org    
Copyright 2008 Group Health Cooperative. Revised: June 04, 2008. Contact Us